Posts Tagged ‘anti-white’

The CBC (in Canada) has produced a hilarious video promoting White Genocide. Genocide of any people is not normally a laughing matter but when you make stuff this bad it becomes the Trolls 2 of anti-White propaganda.

The video is not a picture of the future. The following 2 facts are:

  1. It’s currently at 180 likes and 9,854 dislikes
  2. The comments are disabled

If I was going to have anti-Whites produce stuff that would ultimately cause a backlash or make White Genocide look stupid/evil, I would make stuff VERY similar to this. It seems that just in the last few years the left has become a parody of itself.

A pro-White troll I recently discovered, Herschel Lieberman, has written an article which is surprisingly close to the kind of crap you hear people like Barbara Lerner Specter saying.

It’s getting hard to tell who is a troll these days.


Read Full Post »


I suggest a new word. Actually a re-edit of an existing word. Anti-White like to throw the word ‘racist’ around. Often it just means something is pro-White’ or not sufficiently destructive to the lives and well-being of White people.

If you do have to use the word, why not change the pronunciation to something that reflects the kindergarten level thinking the word is indicative of?


Read Full Post »

Hamilton BS

One of the actors in some Broadway ‘musical’ called Hamilton addressed Vice President Elect Mike Pence after the conclusion of their  performance a little while ago in New York. Mike Pence was in the audience and the cast knew this and wanted to make a statement.

All these anti-Whites who are so ‘scared’ and ‘shaking’ because of the election of a President that might, kind of, not fuck over White people that much, shows how they literally don’t understand the concept that White people have any rights or should be protected from mass 3rd world immigration.

The most I’ll do here is give a quote from the statement to show what an anti-White asshole this guy is:

“We are the diverse America who are alarmed and anxious that your new administration will not protect us, our planet, our children, our parents, or defend us and uphold our inalienable rights, sir. But we truly hope this show has inspired you to uphold our American values, and work on behalf of all of us.”

Yeah, work on behalf of ‘all of us’ EXCEPT White people.

Protect ‘us’, EXCEPT White people.

Protect ‘our’ children, EXCEPT White children.

Protect our ‘parents’, EXCEPT White parents.

Believe me, I could go on.

I hold that the fact that this ‘actor’ made this statement PROVES that he doesn’t care about White people. A guy gets elected by saying he’s actually going to enforce the law by stopping illegal migration into the US and deporting illegal aliens. This then causes idiots like this ‘actor’ to worry that Trump won’t ‘work on behalf of all of us’. For this guy, and anti-Whites like him, ‘working on behalf of all of us’ just means more mass 3rd world immigration and forced assimilation. Which just means fewer White people. Which means WHITE GENOCIDE.

It is not more complicated that that. The whole point of the left in the modern Western world today is to GET RID of White People. The reason why leftists are so ‘scared’ is because they are terrified of the prospect of Whites SURVIVING. And because they’re pussies.

Read Full Post »

Below is part of an article (found here) by some person named ‘Amanda Taub’ writing for some 20th century ‘newspaper’ (made out of actual paper), titled ‘White Nationalism Explained’. While I was reading it I couldn’t help but think of how I would write a parody of this article. My article will follow paragraph by paragraph in bold and italics.

‘White Nationalism,’ Explained

A question has been posed in a puzzled whisper in many of the nation’s living rooms and newsrooms ever since Donald J. Trump’s triumph in this month’s presidential election: What, exactly, is white nationalism?

A question has been posed among many people around the world ever since pro-White activity on the internet got big. What, exactly, is White Genocide?


While white nationalism certainly overlaps with white supremacy and racism, many political scientists say it is a distinct phenomenon — one that was a powerful but often-unseen force during the presidential election and will most likely remain a potent factor in American and European politics in coming years.

While White Genocide certainly overlaps with ideologies of racial hatred, many political scientists say it is a distinct phenomenon – one that has been a powerful yet unacknowledged force driving immigration policy as well as public policy.

Eric Kaufmann, a professor of politics at Birkbeck University in London, has spent years studying the ways that ethnicity intersects with politics. While most researchers in that field focus on ethnic minorities, Professor Kaufmann does the opposite: He studies the behavior of ethnic majorities, particularly whites in the United States and Britain.

Klaus von Krautmeister, a blond haired, blue eyed and fully Gentile descended professor of politics at [insert prestigious institution here], has spent years studying the ideology of anti-White hatred and it’s overarching goal of White Genocide. While most researchers focus on explaining why White people are evil and deserve to be genetically exterminated, Professor Krautmeiester does the opposite: He says that genocide is wrong no matter who is the target – even if it’s White people.

White nationalism, he said, is the belief that national identity should be built around white ethnicity, and that white people should therefore maintain both a demographic majority and dominance of the nation’s culture and public life.

White Genocide, he said, is the belief that every White country and only White countries should have mass 3rd world immigration and that White people must be forced to ‘assimilate’ (i.e. intermarry). The ideology of White Genocide holds that White people should therefore, not maintain demographic majority status, and that every last White person should be ‘chased down’, in oder to expedite the process which will lead to a world without White people.


Some will see the distinction between white nationalism and white supremacy as a semantic sleight of hand. But although many white supremacists are also white nationalists, and vice versa, Professor Kaufmann says the terms are not synonyms: White supremacy is based on a racist belief that white people are innately superior to people of other races; white nationalism is about maintaining political and economic dominance, not just a numerical majority or cultural hegemony.

Some see the distinction between not wanting White Genocide and gassing millions of Jews as a semantic slight of hand. But although many people who want to gas Jews oppose White Genocide, that does not mean that people who oppose White Genocide necessarily want to gas Jews. Professor Krautmeister’s research, backed up by many detailed graphs and statistical analysis, seems to support the claim that not wanting your people to be swamped with millions of people of other races and made to ‘assimilate’ with them, does not mean you want to hurt anybody. Rather, he says, it just shows you want what any normal person would want: to preserve your people and culture in peace.

For a long time, he said, white nationalism was less an ideology than the default presumption of American life. Until quite recently, white Americans could easily see the nation as essentially an extension of their own ethnic group.

For a long time, he said, the concept that the demographic make-up of the United States should be altered never even crossed anyone’s mind. It was as if people assumed that White people had the right to exist.

But the country’s changing demographics, the civil rights movement and a push for multiculturalism in many quarters mean that white Americans are now confronting the prospect of a nation that is no longer built solely around their own identity.

“But then a bunch of assholes said that White people are evil and are to blame for all the world’s problems”, Krautmeister said. And after that, there were a bunch of people called ‘cuckservatives’ who decided they could make a pretty good living pretending to represent the interests of White people, whilst actually letting the demographic genocide take place. “This is why they always talked about ‘winning the Hispanic vote'”, says Krautmeister. “Because they were planning on a future without White people.”.


Mr. Bannon, the Trump adviser, told The New York Times upon his appointment that he does not share those ethno-nationalist views. But under his leadership, Breitbart News has gone to considerable lengths to cater to an audience that does. And in a 2015 radio interview that was resurfaced this week by The Washington Post, Mr. Bannon opposed even highly skilled immigration, implying he believed it was a threat to American culture.

An example of one of these assholes that professor Krautmeister cites is comments made by former French President Nicolas Sarkozy:

“When two-thirds or three-quarters of the C.E.O.s in Silicon Valley are from South Asia or from Asia, I think …,” he said, trailing off midsentence before continuing a moment later, “a country is more than an economy. We’re a civic society.”

“People aren’t just economic units”, says Krautmeister. “They’re actual people who have inherited a culture and identity. You can’t just destroy that in order to increase the GDP a few points.”.


Several studies of other countries have found that a desire to protect traditional values and culture is the strongest predictor of support for the sort of populism that propelled Mr. Trump to power in the United States.

Studies show that people of all races don’t want to be exterminated.

Many of those voters would not think of themselves as white nationalists, and the cultural values and traditions they seek to protect are not necessarily explicitly racial. However, those traditions formed when national identity and culture were essentially synonymous with whiteness. So the impulse to protect them from social and demographic change is essentially an attempt to turn back the clock to a less-diverse time.

Many people who advocate White Genocide don’t even care about other races. They just focus all their hatred on one group of people (White people). Because they feel so much hatred, they endlessly talk about ‘tolerance’ and ‘love’. Ironic, isn’t it?


Professor Kaufmann argues that anxiety over white identity and anti-immigrant populist politicians can have a symbiotic relationship, each strengthening the other. When populist politicians gain mainstream success, that can make white nationalist ideas more socially acceptable.

Professor Krautmeister argues that people who demand White Genocide feel threatened by any opposition to it. They worry that if more and more White people point out the simple fact that what is being done to White countries is just plain wrong, the whole scam (which many of them make a handsome living off of in the form of ‘Whiteness’ studies and the like) will be over and they’ll have to get real jobs.

“It’s not just a question of ethnic change and people being alarmed over it,” he said. “It’s also a question of what people see as the boundaries of acceptable opposition. It’s about what counts as racism, and whether it’s racist to vote for a far-right party.”

“Once people refuse to put up with this shit – it will end.”.

“This is all about the anti-racist norm,” Professor Kaufmann continued. “If it’s weakening or eroding because people think the boundaries have shifted.

“This is all about the anti-White norm,” Professor Krautmeister continued. “If it’s weakening or eroding it’s because people realize anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White.”.

Read Full Post »

Support Jade Armenio

This girl was assaulted for saying that she hoped Trump would win.

All this whining about how, with the election of Trump, Whites are telling POC that they don’t matter or whatever. Assaults like this happen every day. That Black girl isn’t saying this girl doesn’t ‘matter’, she hates her and is attacking her.

One of the reasons I have always been so pissed about racial issues is that my whole life I have heard people who claim to believe in ‘tolerance’ complaining about things like ‘unconscious racism’ whilst Blacks, Latinos and Muslims are attacking White people in the streets.

I was lucky enough go grow up in a very White town and go to a very White high school. I can’t imagine how pissed off White kids that have to go to heavily Black and Latino schools must be.

Read Full Post »

Whites cannot be defeated physically. Whites must be defeated psychologically

Why fight an enemy when you can convince him he has no chance of victory? Why only convince him he has no chance of victory when you can convince him he doesn’t even have the right to exist. Why simply demotivate him when you can convince him to actively fight against his people. This is the purpose of psychological warfare. Sun Tzu says that the acme of skill is to defeat an enemy without using force.

Anti-White propaganda achieves all of these things. Anti-White propaganda puts Whites on the defensive. It is not who wins the argument, it is what the argument is about. If we debate the historical accuracy of the film 12 Years a Slave we lose. If we debate why only White countries are supposed to feel guilty for slavery/colonialism (not Turkey, Japan, et al.) we win. If we debate how nasty slavery in America was we lose. If we debate why only White countries are supposed to accept immigration but not Japan or South Korea we win.

12 Years a Slave makes us feel guilty and thus prevents us from morally justifying taking any political action that would defend ourselves. The Holocaust makes us feel like any action we take to defend ourselves is ‘Nazism’ and will lead to another Holocaust.

The issue is not the legacy of slavery. The issue is not the Holocaust. The issue is White Genocide. These movies, college classes and news stories are produced to wage psychological warfare against us. Their purpose is to determine what the issue is. But the issue is White Genocide.

If Whites take to the streets in protest we win. But psychology is the antecedent to action. We must wage psychological warfare first. If we can get White kids to go on the offensive and repeat “Anti-Racist is a Codeword for Anti-White” and “White Genocide” then the foundation has been laid. Political action will follow. If we keep discussing slavery movies, if we keep defending ourselves from their accusations, we will never fight back.

“We are all human!” does not justify White GENOCIDE

“We all bleed red!” does not justify White GENOCIDE

“Because of history ” does not justify White GENOCIDE

“For the economy” does not justify White GENOCIDE

“A shortage of doctors” does not justify White GENOCIDE

“Race is a social construct!” does not justify White GENOCIDE

“We are all from Africa!” does not justify White GENOCIDE

Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White.

Read Full Post »

I like to use the term ‘demographic genocide’ because I think it almost automatically causes white people to think of immigration. The combination of the two words is great because it connects a word we are so often used to hearing in connection with “The Changing Face Of (insert a white country here)”, and a word we associate with the wholesale, calculated extermination of a people. And that’s exactly what non-white immigration into EVERY white country and ONLY white countries is.

I first heard the term was used by the Dalai Lama to describe China’s policy of moving massive numbers of ethnic Han Chinese into the province of Tibet. I think his point was that Beijing was flooding Tibet with Han Chinese in order to a) immediately create a  political voting block that would ensure Tibet would remain a part of China, and b) move so many Chinese in, that the remaining Tibetans would simply intermarry and be absorbed into the Chinese population – thus bringing about the genetic extermination of the Tibetan people.

The policy is the same as what our leaders here in the West are doing to whites. First, get voters for the pro-multicultural elite in order to solidify their rule, and secondly, to move so many non-whites in that the remaining whites simply intermarry with them and are submerged into the larger demographic swamp.

And if some whites remained, they would be such a tiny percentage of the population that they would, presumably, not be able to change anything. Remember the UN definition of ‘genocide

“Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;”

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »