Posts Tagged ‘culture’

My comments on the Hamilton thing aside; I have one very important question on the matter:

What the fuck was Mike Pence doing going to see a piece of shit musical like Hamilton anyway?

I guess it might have been a political move to show that Trump and company are not ‘waycist’. But seriously, couldn’t he have gone to see a performance of something legitimate like A Love Supreme instead?

And the whole controversy regarding Jewish and Asian Nazi’s infiltrating the NPI conference. Who cares what the 20th century media thinks about anything?

The fact that some ‘journalists’ are trying to make the NPI look like a Nazi organization, or that some talentless hack in New York made a ‘musical’ depicting America’s founding fathers as Blacks that dance to hip-hop means nothing. Nobody should care, and increasingly, nobody does.

I don’t care that the 20th century media thinks the NPI is a Nazi organization. (They think an all-White sewing circle is a potential Nazi organization). I get my news from the internet.

I don’t care that there is a production on Broadway right now that is anti-White. Nobody will remember this thing 20 years from now. Nobody remembers the degenerate crap that was being preformed in Wiemar Germany either. People remember this:

I have discovered a very helpful trick for dealing with the biased media and all the anti-White movies and TV that are put out these days:


Seriously, it works. If you just don’t pay attention to it, it won’t frustrate you. AND (this is big), if you don’t watch it, it will eventually die.


Read Full Post »

Does anyone have a better term for this outdated media matrix that used to have dominance over the culture, politics and very thought of the public?

I’m old enough to remember when everyone (not just your parents) read these things called ‘newspapers’. They were actually made out of paper. You would read some article which was written by a journalism major, who never would have even gotten a job interview if they hadn’t consistently regurgitated leftist ideology, and whatever he wrote was checked by the Trotskyite editor-in-chief who ran things. And after you were finished reading it, there was no comments section in which to post hatefacts.

I remember spending a Saturday afternoon working on a student paper at my University. We were each coming up with a funny story to publish and I was working on something that was about butch lesbians. One of the other ‘journalists’ there told me, it’s fine to write about butch lesbians as long as you make it clear your lampooning stereotypes about butch lesbians. I wasn’t. I was making fun of butch lesbians. The atmosphere was so stifling and politically correct I couldn’t take it and left. That was my first and last foray into ‘mainstream’ journalism.

EVERY person in the media (which we traditionally call ‘mainstream’), is a person who had no problem with that uncreative, humourless, authoritarian atmosphere.

In my last post I claimed that the pollsters were not mistaken, they outright lied. While that is true, there were also a great many pundits on TV who just plain believed their own bullshit.

I encourage all 3.5 of you who are reading this to consider starting your own blog, YouTube channel, podcast or whatever (assuming you haven’t already). The internet, in human years, is not even a teenager – it’s a boy who has big dreams. People who write blogs or do YouTube videos will increasingly have a significant influence on politics and culture.

I sometimes wonder if leftists realize how utterly fucked they are. THE REASON why the attitudes of White Americans on race, sexuality, immigration, etc, changed is because of the MSM. The colleges had their influence as well but it is TV in particular which completely altered the culture of the US.

It used to be basically unthinkable that any respectable White woman would date a black. Heck, intermarriage was illegal not long ago. The sexual promiscuity we take for granted today was almost exclusively to be found among a small perverted fringe. White people didn’t even consider the notion that America should be anything other than White, just as today, many Whites don’t even consider the idea that it should not be flooded with millions of 3rd worlders.

100 years from now, historians will say that the internet got big around 2000, and that was the end of White genocide. They won’t talk about how things were still up in the air for a while after that. They will only record the results of what we do now.

Read Full Post »

I have listened to so many podcasts, read so many blog posts and seen so many end-of-the-world documentaries and movies that I am convinced such fearful prognostication has become part of the background of contemporary, post-Lehman Brothers culture. The forcasts people make are quite serious. They are talking about inflation, riots, unemployment, poverty, etc …

But for all the doom and gloom we are subjected to, I cannot imagine a single moral/cultural consequence of such economic collapse which would in any way be negative. It is exzactly the spanking we NEED. We are so materialistic, selfish and above all, in awe of stupid, dogmatic ideology which is diametrically opposed to any kind of sanity or sustainability that the only conceivable way we will reform ourselves and our society is to suffer. And that is, unfortunately, the cure for many of our problems.

Only a tiny, highly rational elite of people are able to simply read a few books and conclude that their present course is wrong. For the bulk of people, for whole countries, this intellectual process of realizeing does not happen. If they are so deluded that they cannot see how insane and self-destructive our materialistic, multicultural, quagmire society is, then the only way for them to change their ways is to suffer the consequences of their delusions. Most alcholics need to hit rock bottom. Some may be able to figure out that something is wrong before that, but when you are dealing with a whole society made up of millions of people, you HAVE TO hit rock bottom.

Read Full Post »

Today we’ll look at a few examples of white art and why it’s so important for us in this culturally and racially dark age. The first example (seen above) is something I discovered when I was a teenager. I actually bought a poster that combined these three John William Waterhouse paintings (from left to right: Ophelia, Psyche Opening the Golden Box, Windflower). Truth be told, there was a ‘hormonal’ element to the appeal of these paintings for me. To put it in our modern lingo: some pictures of hot white girls.

These three paintings celebrate white female beauty and young people will imprint on these kinds of images.

I think I inadvertently read on Google News that Beyonce was named the worlds sexiest woman (I wonder how many people silently disagree with that). I can’t imagine how they could think she is more atractive than any number of white women, but then again that is my instinctive preference. (The diversity of human aesthetic/sexual preference is facinating. There are tribes in Pakistan that consider a woman more feminine the hairier she is. And Massi women find a man masculine if he is, not only tall, but skinny). My only guess is that the people who gave Beyonce that title were trying to prove that they were ‘on the cutting edge’ and perhaps they felt the Obamanation damanded the title be given to such a woman.

I knew a REALLY left wing girl in University who said that she thought the character ‘Warrick‘ from CSI Las Vegas was attractive. As my above reference to the highly alien preferences of the tribes of Pakistan and the Masai attest, I respect the right of different races to find different things attractive. But god damn! If you’re a white girl and you find that attractive then there is something very wrong with you and there is going to be something VERY wrong with your kids.

Anyways, the above three paintings display the Holy Trinity of Aryan hair colours: Redhead, Blonde and Brunette. Actually, black haired women should not be left out:

Andrea Corr of the Irish band The Coors

I rest my case.

In summation, having art in your home with these uniquely European types of beauty will help you and your family to psychologically secede from the larger trash society and nurture a dissident white culture. It is just one of the ways in which our people will survive this demographic genocide that is being committed against us.

In a future post we will look at some art that is subverive as it celebrates parenthood and fertility.

Read Full Post »

Accolade - Edmund Blair Leighton

I remember being in a Philosophy class called 'The Philosophy of Art' in University years ago and hearing about something called 'Piss Christ'. Our professor was the sort of woman who is so infected with feminist disease that it was not even necessary to speak to her to know what sort of woman she was. She had a short, militant haircut and narrow hips that had clearly not passed a single child.  And by her age one could tell that her last sad, solitary egg had floated off to nothingness some time ago.
Despite my hatred of anti-white ‘intellectuals’ like her, I couldn’t help but feel something like pity for her when she claimed that the bond between mother and child was actually a social construct. She said that in France in the 17th or 18th century, upper-class women had their children taken away after birth and raised by someone else until they were adolescent (I don’t know if this is true and it doesn’t really matter). And thus, the concept of some mother-child bond was just ‘cultural’. The pain of the modern woman who decieded to not have kids (or put it off for too long) must be a very unique anguish which is hard to describe. And the use of political ideology to explain away or redirect that dissatisfaction makes it all the more pathetic. I suppose for that generation of feminists, politics really is personal.

‘Piss Christ’ is a photograph of a crucifix, submerged is urine. There’s not a whole lot more to say about it. This kind of crap is always protected by freedom of speech, but if someone wanted to use similarly scatological methods to insult black slavery, or the Holocaust or Islam, it would not be allowed. But if anything white is treated in this way, or in this case Christian (which is hated only because it has been the traditional religion of white people for the last 1000 years or so), it is ‘intersting’ and it ‘challenges’ us.

Art is a battlefield. It can be other things as well but in the present day it is often a forum in which the struggle for our hearts and minds is fought. For many white people, our traditional, positive art is unknown. They are hooked up to the Matrix of MTV and are not even aware of it.

Temptation - William Bouguereau

For myself, as a teenager, discovering classical music, particularly Beethoven, Mozart and Bach, and later Rachmaninoff, Tchaikovsky and Wagner was revolutionary. It was completly different from anything I had heard and it seemed diametrically opposed to the materialism, frivolity and groinal urges of pop music.

Later on I got into paintings and it was specifically the work of William

The Lady Clare (Study) - John William Waterhouse

Bouguereau and John William Waterhouse which showed me what visual art could be. I also found a great website (artrenewal.org) which seemed to share my feelings about what a serious matter art was. 

This meta-war we are fighting has many fronts. One of them is your living room, especially if you have kids. Is there a TV hooked up to cable right now? If there is then you are losing on that particular front. The art, music and general entertainment we enjoy (I hate it when people say we ‘consume’ art) are important. As we find dark, foreign faces around us in cosmopolitan centres, it is important to remind ourelves and our children of what OUR beauty is. And let it be held up as an ideal we can strive for so that, in the face of sneering brown hatred,  we have a vision of what our future will be.

Read Full Post »

Cathedral in Prague

Some people argue that the traditional perception of the Middle Ages ought to be revised. The image we normally have of this period is one of a ‘Dark Age’ of injustice and intellectual lethargy, where oppressed serfs in dirty rags toil on the land for the benefit of a small arrogant elite of landowners, and a dogmatic theocracy impedes every attempt at progress.

Apparently, the Middle Ages were not as ‘dark’ as previously thought. Perhaps this historical misconception is a legacy of the French Revolution, with its mad dash to destroy all that came before in order to better establish liberty, equality and brotherhood. There are many examples of invention and flowering that took place between the fall of the Roman Empire and the Enlightenment. However, these examples only serve to promote the idea that the Middles Ages weren’t so bad, and that many good things were produced at that time.

But a more compelling argument can be made for this maligned period when one considers its most prominent buildings. When tourists go to Europe to see impressive monuments, they invariably go to churches, cathedrals and the like. Though American and Japanese gawkers snap pictures of these structures because they are beautiful, they were built not only to be pleasing to the eye but to serve a very important function: They were places of worship.

In the Middle Ages great resources and effort were put into manifesting the greatness of God. Architecture, as well as art, was always linked with the spiritual. Compare this to the great buildings of today.

The skyline of most major western cities is dominated by banks and corporate offices. The ‘monuments’ of today are devoted entirely to the accumulation of money and material things. Today we consider ourselves advanced because we have more money, higher living standards, and greater rights for all citizens. Our highest ideal is the advancement of equality and to one day provide adequate financial and medical resources for everyone. We conceive of the purpose of human life as almost entirely material. At best we can only hold up bland egalitarian principals as our highest ambition – but only because they provide maximum personal happiness. No further does our thinking extend.

People in the Middle Ages saw themselves as spiritual beings, linked with their community and with God. And they took seriously the moral edicts of the Church as children did with their parents. Today, we often smirk at any talk or morals, pursue our personal agenda with the worst sort of pride, and assign prestige to the most peculiar of people.  For all the criticism we can make of the former period, it seems far less vapid than the present. When re-evaluating the Middle Ages we should not only ask if they really were so backwards, but we ought to examine our own period and ask if we are so advanced today.

Read Full Post »